Wednesday, April 30, 2008

The Big Break: Ka’anapali - Episode 3

Episode 3, and no eliminations yet. But the show promises that someone will go home today. I've made no secret about who I think should go, and watching the "confession" videos on the Golf Channel website (another Big Break related guilty pleasure I've acquired), I can truthfully say that I am not alone. All of the players have acknowledged at some time that they are baffled at how Cirbe even managed to make it onto the show. But having watched 3 previous seasons, I know that there are numerous ways in which a bad player can manage to stick around.



* * * * Warning: Potential Spoilage Below * * * *

Big Break: Ka'anapali
Episode 3: "Turn a Blind Eye"
Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Finally, the show seems to settled into its version of golf. Lot's of shots, not a lot of filler. I particularly enjoyed the first immunity challenge with the blind approach shots.

My only criticism is the failure to show the actual shots from the $5,000 bonus challenge for the players who beat their roommates in the first challenge and gained immunity for the show. Why show an unintelligible montage? At least post the actual shots on the Golf Channel website under "bonus clips."

Thankfully, when all was said and done, Cirbe is gone. Hallelujah.

After the elimination challenge with Tina (side note: Tina better step it up soon), a bunch of the ladies said that she "rose to the challenge". I disagree. I think she still played crappy golf. Just not as crappy as every one of her shots before that elimination challenge. The incident where Cirbe took 5 MINUTES to make one putt was not only unacceptable, it was unfair to Tina. It was just another example of why Cirbe should not have even been on the show. She is just not tournament golf experienced.

I'm not sure who will actually be next to go, but Dana bugs the crap outta me, so I'm voting for her. Unless they don't show her talking . . . then she is tolerable.





Wednesday, April 23, 2008

The Big Break: Ka’anapali - Episode 2

At the Conclusion of Episode 1 - "Hit the Ground Running", Team Pink, (Elizabeth, Adrienne, Sophie, and Cirbe) earned immunity despite Cirbe's repeated attempts to derail the entire team with her [insert phrase here with meaning that is exactly the opposite of "golf shots"]. No one was eliminated on Episode 1, but the members of Team Orange (Lori, Dana, Christina, and Susan) and Team Purple (Samantha, Tina, Courtney, and Kim) were left to do battle in Episode 2 to determine which player would be first to go home.

A side note: The Golf Channel has now posted several videos including the players complete "confessionals", contestant bios, audition videos, "sneak peak" at the following week's show, "bonus clips", and a "recap" of the last show. Also new to the site is "3 Play", a weekly question for 3 of the contestants. This week's question, posed to Adrienne, Christina, and Cirbe, is "What are your first impressions of the other contestants so far?" I found the 3 Play videos pretty annoying actually, because it looks like the producers are trying to stir up trouble. I really hope The Big Break isn't going to turn into a run of the mill "reality" TV show that relies on the personality conflicts instead of the golf. The golf already provides enough drama for the target audience. If I wanted to see people being manipulated by the producers and acting like immature adolescents, I would watch "The Real World".


* * * * Warning: Spoilers Below * * * *







Big Break: Ka'anapali

Episode 2: "Reliable Roommate Needed"
Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Well, I hate to begin with a complaint, but again the show starts with waaaaayy too much filler. We have to watch roommate choices, flag planting, and drama surrounding flag planting. No one swings a club until 15 minutes into the show. For the first "safety challenge", a total of 6 balls are hit. After that, the next challenge doesn't start until 28 minutes into the show. So, 1/2 of the show is over, and we've seen 6 golf swings. Lame.

Anyway, on to the performances . . .

First Safety Challenge - "Pick Your Distance": Roommates play as a team and each player has one chance to hit their ball into a circle around the pin. To gain immunity, both balls must be in the circle. In the event that more than one team gets both balls in the circle, the team hitting from the longest tee wins.

The teams participating in this episode are:

Samantha & Kim
Susan & Dana
Lori & Christina
Tina & Courtney

I was glad to see Samantha and Kim gain immunity in the first "safety challenge". They chose to hit from the longest tee and they both nailed their shots. Kim has looked solid almost every time she has swung her club, and it was nice to see something from Samantha that showed why she has won twice on the Ladies European Tour. Plus, she comes off as just so darn sweet and charming. I was disappointed, however, that we didn't get to see Kim in the second "safety challenge" - the long drive. She hammers the ball.

Second Safety Challenge - "Drive": Long Drive. Each player gets one ball. Must be in the grid (straight) and longer distances get more points.

You could tell that there had been a lot of standing around prior to this challenge. None of the ladies' swings looked grooved and, ultimately, the challenge had nothing to do with distance and everything to do with driving the ball straight. As a result, the two weakest players not named Cirbe ended up winning immunity. Susan and Dana are safely on to the next show without Dana having to swing a club because not a single payer from the other two teams could get a ball in the grid. Not really a stunning display of talent from anyone.

While I'm no reality TV expert, I think the Golf Channel could improve the appearance of the competitors' talent on the Big Break if they could find a way to keep the competitors swinging their clubs.

Dana referred to herself as "cougar-mama" again this week. And this time she called Susan her "kitten". Make it stop. Please, make it stop.

Third Safety Challenge - "Approach": Closest to the pin. Concentric circles around the pin with points from 1 (on the green) to 5 (closest to the hole). Another challenge where each competitor hits only one ball. So, 35 minutes into the show, and we've seen a total of 15 swings. No wonder these ladies are having trouble with their shots. Considering the "production time" between challenges and locations, how can they possibly stay loose? . . . half a day, one swing . . . another half day, one swing. The pace of the show itself, however, did pick up starting with this challenge.

Lori makes up for her fat shot in the first challenge and puts one in the 4 point circle. Her teammate/roommate Christina gets 1 point for hitting it one the green. Courtney gets 1 point for hitting it one the green, and Tina sprays it off the green. Lori and Christina are safe. Not much to say here other than the performances are disappointing so far. It's got to be a result of the swirling winds and the wait-time between shots, because these are short iron distances.

Elimination Challenge: Okay, this is my first compliment for this episode. I like the way they set up this elimination challenge. Rather than having Tina and Courtney play against each other, they play 2 holes against "par". If either or both of the competitor plays the 2 holes at par or better, they are not eliminated. If they play the 2 holes over par, they are eliminated.

If you are going to set up team-based challenges where a good player can get dragged into elimination by a teammate they didn't choose, it's only fair that the better player not be subjected to the risk of getting knocked out by a weaker player who gets lucky in the elimination round. Frankly though, the only team event I want to see from now on is players who wear golf shoes when they golf, versus players who golf in their bare feet. Anyway . . .

Courtney went first and looked very solid on both holes despite a slightly errant tee shot on the second hole. She finished at even par and deserved to be safe considering her teammate, Tina, had been hitting poor shots all day. Because we haven't seen very many swings from the competitors, it wasn't until the elimination challenge that I noticed what a strange swing Courtney has. On her backswing, she takes the club away low and off plane, then adjusts at the top and gets on plane for the downswing. It's sort of like Jim Furyk, except Courtney loops in the opposite direction (clockwise, instead of Furyk's counter-clockwise). Most players with Courtney's swing end up coming over-the-top with an outside-in swing that puts enough sidespin on the ball to slice it around corners. But Courtney squares the club up nicely and consistently. I do wish she would stop talking about her husband though. It's sweet and all, but enough already.

Tina looked shaky on the first hole, but saved par with her final putt. On the second hole, she looked solid and birdied the hole. I'm convinced that once these ladies get warmed up and have the opportunity to hit balls without interruption, they have some respectable skills. (Except for Cirbe. I have yet to see anything from her that resembles talent.)

I wonder how many comments about "all the standing around" and "not being warmed up" are edited out of the confessionals?

Overall, I didn't mind that no one was eliminated. Mainly because I want the weakest player, Cirbe, to get booted first. That is, unless, Dana refers to herself as "cougar-mama" again on the third episode. Three strikes and you're out, Dana.


Monday, April 21, 2008

Where Did All of These Training Aids Come From?

Remember the scene from the movie "Tin Cup" where Dr. Molly Griswold (Rene Russo) walks into Roy "Tin Cup" McAvoy's (Kevin Costner) trailer and finds him strapped head to toe in an assortment of ridiculous training aids that McAvoy confiscated from Griswold during her first lesson? McAvoy, in a desperate attempt to cure a case of "the shanks" that cropped up days before the U.S. Open, has resorted to the very "waste of money" he ridiculed only a few short weeks earlier.



Well, that's how I feel about golf training aids. Rather than buying some goofy looking training aid, I've always felt that I was better off spending my money on a lesson with a pro, or going to the range, or hitting the practice green, or just playing some golf.

So . . . how the @#$% did I end up with all of these golf training aids scattered around my house?!? Where is the disconnect between what I think (opinion) and what I do (fact)? And which is right?

Well, first let's start with how it happened. I'm no expert on the human mind (or any other species of mind), but I play one on the internet . . . so here's what I think.

I think it's a slow progression. It's a disease that infiltrates us in tiny, innocent appearing doses. By the time we finally realize that we have been infected, it's already too late. Oh sure, we start out looking at the massive offering of training aids as a whole - and they look like a big pile of plastic, metal, and velcro junk. At the beginning, it's the craziest looking contraptions/torture devices that stick in our mind.



As a result, temptation is negligible. Besides, you don't need them. Your swing/stroke is just fine and those things don't work anyway. Except . . . it's not . . . and maybe, just maybe, they do.

Then, unexpectedly one day, some golf "accessory" catches your attention. Maybe it's because your instructor mentioned it, or because a friend gave it a good review, or because no matter what you do, you can't stop that @#$%ing little white ball from slicing into the woods. So, you start to think "Hmmm, now that device isn't completely stupid looking. That thing might actually help with this one little hitch in my swing/stroke."

Does that sound familiar? If not, then how about this: "I know that I really shouldn't buy that box of Thin Mints from the girl scouts at my door . . . but it's for a good cause and I'll only eat a couple. I'll just give the rest away at the office tomorrow. In fact, those little girls are so cute and they are working so hard, maybe I'll buy a box of Tagalongs and a box of Do-Si-Dos too." An hour later, you've eaten all three boxes for dinner and your stomach is revolting in the most revolting manner.

Training aids . . . same thing. Instead of a sweet tooth, you're trying to cure a banana ball. Maybe the overdose takes longer than with Girl Scout Cookies, but you are definitely feeding a need you denied having. Hey, is anyone else hungry now?

As for whether individual training aids work for you . . . well, only you can decide that. I can only give you my opinion on the ones that I have tried. And so here they are. It's the great training aid roundup review of Spring 2008.

1. The Boomerang Putting System.



Date of Purchase: Fall 2006

Why I bought it: I had read universally good reviews on various golf message boards, it was on sale, and it was something I could do in my living room while watching golf on TV.

Description: A variation on the classic ball-return putting cup. The Boomerang is an adjustable sloped ramp with round depression. The object is to putt one ball and have it stay in the depression, then putt another ball and knock the first ball out of the depression, causing both balls to return to you using only gravity.

The Verdict: This one is still set up in my living room (I'm single - if you are not, your mileage may vary) and I use it frequently. It's moderately fun to use, it works the way it's supposed to, and the balls (usually) roll back to your feet on missed putts (unlike those battery operated cups which frequently malfunction and shoot the ball in random trajectories, or not at all.) In my opinion, anything that makes you practice your stroke is a good thing. This makes me practice my stroke.

Where to buy:



2. Impact Bag



Date of purchase: Spring 2007

Why I bought it: I have a problem with casting my club (flipping the club instead of maintaining wrist angle through impact). The impact bag is one of the few training aids I've seen (in one form or another) in almost every teaching pro's arsenal. After my pro had me swing at an old tire to help stop me from my casting, I bought an impact bag to use at home. Also, they are relatively cheap.

Description: It's a big, round, vinyl, pillowcase with a zipper at the top where you stuff in towels to add weight and resistance. Then you swing at it with your club. It forces you to hit the bag square with the shaft and club face.

The Verdict: It works as far as forcing the correct club position at impact, but I don't use it as often as I should. Anything that I can't use while actually hitting balls doesn't work as well for me because I need to feel the impact of the ball and see my ball flight. If I took it to the range with me and smacked it a few times and then hit some balls, maybe it would be more beneficial for me. But, it's sort of loud when you smack it, and the last thing I want is more attention at the driving range for my swing faults. Bottom line, it stays at home because I'm embarrassed to drag it out with me. If I could get just over myself and use it more, it might actually do some good.

Where to buy:
(note, I have the Izzo brand version, but there are many brands available and as far as I can tell, they are all basically the same)



3. Those little plastic whiffle balls.


Date of Purchase: Summer 2006

Why I bought it: 99 cents for a 4 pack.

Description: Little plastic whiffle balls for hitting in the back yard.

The Verdict: Next.

Where to buy:
  • Your local golf store


4. Big 8' Pop-Up Hitting Net



Date of Purchase: Winter 2007/08

Why I bought it: It was mispriced and I got it for $49 when it was supposed to be $179.

Description: Big pop-up hitting net.

The verdict: Again, I'm not a big fan of anything that doesn't let me see my ball flight. I would rather just go to the range and pay to hit a bucket of balls. However, I plan to use this net in conjunction with a camcorder to record my swing in the privacy of my own back yard. I believe that video review is invaluable in differentiating between what you think you are doing with your swing, and what you are actually doing. So the verdict is still out on whether this net is a worthwhile purchase. But in terms of the net itself, the Callaway 8' Quad Net I bought is relatively portable, easy to put up, sturdy, and works exactly the way it's supposed to. I am very happy with it. I just wish my basement ceiling was higher so I could keep it up and set up a permanent indoor swing studio.

Where to buy:

5. The Power Angle Pro



Date of Purchase: Spring 2008

Why I bought it: My pro suggested it. He uses one.

Description: Reminder grip on an aluminum tube bent all to @#$%.

The verdict: Oh dear. This is one of those training aids that just plain looks silly. If it hadn't been for my pro's recommendation, I wouldn't have looked twice at this thing. (Well, maybe twice for an extra chuckle.) Especially considering that it retails for $69.

But here's the thing: my biggest swing problem is an over-the-top move. Instead of dropping into the slot at the start of my downswing, I rush my hands and end up with an outside-in move. The Power Angle Pro does one thing - it forces your arms into the proper position.

I can't say I'm thrilled with this device, but I also can't say it doesn't work. I do use it occasionally, and it definitely lets you feel the proper position at each stage of the swing. I would even be willing to admit that it has probably helped me a little. But overall, my issue with the Power Angle Pro has been translating the feeling with the training aid in my hands into the feeling with a club in my hands. As I've mentioned several times in this post, I prefer practice that lets me feel the impact of the ball and see actual ball flight. But if you are someone who can easily convert abstract muscle memory into your swing, this product might work for you. For me, it sits next to my couch and I pick it up and use it whenever I see it. Sometimes I even take it to the range with me. But like a not-quite-hot "friend with benefits", I try to keep it out of the view of anyone who might recognize me. (Not that I would personally know anything about those types of FWB arrangements. But I hear things. I'm just sayin' . . .)

Where to buy:





6. The Inside Approach



Date of Purchase:
Spring 2008

Why I bought it: To help correct my over the top move, and because it was on sale for $18. My pro had me working on the same drill during a lesson using an old shaft stuck in the ground at an angle. I would have just done the same thing with an old shaft or a fiberglass driveway marker from Home Depot (the ones designed to let snowplows know where curbs, driveways, parked cars, etc. are buried - you frequently see touring pros using them at the practice range.) Except that my local range uses mats, not grass, so I needed an alternative for my daily practice.

Description: PVC pipe and foam rubber contraption that makes you swing your club in an arc path. If you swing "over the top" (i.e., outside-to-inside path) you hit the foam rubber portion of the contraption and the whole thing comes apart and goes flying in a minimally impressive display of destruction. The box also includes a DVD, which I have not watched.

The verdict: This is a training aid that originally retailed for $79, now sells for $39, is available at Target for $25, and was (is?) on sale for $18 at Target. A homemade version can also be built for considerably less from materials available at any well-stocked hardware store. But for $18, it was worth it to me to avoid a trip to the Home Depot, and the construction time thereafter.

As for the effectiveness . . . to my surprise, the darn thing seems to work. For the first time ever, I am suppressing my over-the-top move and I am hitting straighter and more consistently. This is my favorite training aid at the moment and, because I can hit balls and see my ball flight, I take it with me to the range every day. It may look silly (especially when I occasionally revert back to my over-the-top swing and send the foam rubber piece flying 10 feet onto the range in front of the morning range crowd), but it seems to work.

My only concerns with The Inside Approach are related to its durability. The foam rubber padding/sleeve has suffered serious damage on the few occasions when I have struck it "head on" (i.e. the club head strikes the circular portion of the foam rubber sleeve that faces down the target line.) I recommend wrapping the end of the foam cylinder with duct tape before use to prevent pieces from being sliced (no pun intended) off. And for Pete's sake, use black duct tape when you do this. That, or find a local hardware store and buy a length of similarly sized pipe insulation that you can use as a replacement as needed. If necessary, call the makers of the product. I found them to be extremely friendly and helpful when I emailed and called.

Where to buy:





Conclusion: The main thing to keep in mind with any training aid is that YMMV ("your mileage may vary"). I highly suggest finding a teaching pro you like, take some lessons, and talk to him/her about whether you might benefit from a particular training aid. There are some crazy devices out there, but there are also some that seem to actually help.




Thursday, April 17, 2008

Book Review: "Who's Your Caddy?" by Rick Reilly

"Who's Your Caddy?: Looping for the Great, Near Great, and Reprobates of Golf"

by Rick Reilly


Originally published: May 2003
Paperback: 272 pages



In "Who's Your Caddy?: Looping for the Great, Near Great, and Reprobates of Golf", Sports Illustrated columnist Rick Reilly chronicles his attempts at caddying for PGA and LPGA players, celebrities, and high stakes gamblers. Reilly, with no prior caddying experience, relates his journey from terrible novice caddy to terrible somewhat-experienced caddy in his signature lighthearted and humorous style. Each chapter of "Who's Your Caddy?" is comprised of a story about Reilly's experience caddying for a specific golfer, including such notables as John Daly, David Duval, Donald Trump, and Bob Newhart. In addition to the narrative of the loop itself, Reilly provides just enough biographical and background information in each chapter so that even a non-golfer can understand the context of each individual story.

"Who's Your Caddy?" is by no means an important piece of golf literature in the same category of works such as "The Greatest Game Ever Played" by Mark Frost. It is, however, an extremely humorous and occasionally informative look at one of the often overlooked and important facets of the game - the caddy. I enjoyed the chapter on the LPGA in particular. However, I will refrain from re-telling any of the anecdotes in order to avoid spoiling the fun. And thanks to Reilly's witty storytelling skills, there is fun to be had. (On the other hand, I can't even look at John Daly in the Winn Grips commercials after the "bratwurst" story . . . [shiver!] )

The inspiring chapter on Casey Martin, current University of Oregon head golf coach and former Supreme Court litigant in a landmark case that granted him the right to use a golf cart in PGA tour events under the "American's with Disabilities Act of 1990", is worth reading for its important content. Even if you've already formed an opinion on whether Martin's lengthy fight with the PGA Tour was shameful, heroic, or much ado about nothing, Reilly's descriptions of the effects of Martin's disability warrant consideration before assessing the merits of Martin's claims.

"Who's Your Caddy?" is one of my favorite golf-related books, and it is a quick and easy read even for golfers not normally inclined to read anything longer than a scorecard or the beer menu at the 19th hole. Pick it up.





Wednesday, April 16, 2008

The Big Break: Ka’anapali - Episode 1

I have a confession to make. I like The Big Break 'reality' 'golf' show on the The Golf Channel. And I like the ladies' versions the best. Sure, I realize it's not actually 'reality'. I also know that it's not really 'golf'. But I watch the PGA and LPGA for "real" "golf". The Big Break is an entertainment show. And for some reason, it entertains me. Especially the ladies' versions.

I was a reality show virgin until The Big Break VI: Trump National, which aired beginning in September 2006 - just after I started playing golf. The Big Break is still the only reality show I watch. Have I mentioned that I like when they feature the ladies? (Psssst! I believe the term you are probably searching for right now is "horndog" . . . or . . . quite possibly, "corndog" . . . mmmmmm corndogs . . .)

Anyway, I have been looking forward to Big Break: Ka'anapali because it's the first all female Big Break to air since I started watching the show. It also didn't hurt that the majority of the ladies are darn attractive, and their (golf) qualifications appear to be better than any of the previous female contestants.

Prior to the first episode, I reviewed the the player's bios on The Golf Channel website, looked at the videos of their swings, and generally wasted about an hour of my life familiarizing myself with the contestants. (Thanks to TiVo, wireless internet, and a cordless phone, I am a multimedia multi-tasker! I can complete 3 meaningless tasks at 1 time! The dishes, however, are still dirty. D'oh!) So, when the first episode aired on April 15th, I was ready! And by "ready", I mean of course that I ignored it. (I let TiVo record it, and watched it later so I could fast forward through the commercials. Hurray for TiVo!)

Rather than re-summarize the player's bios, I have just posted their Big Break headshots (all photos . . . errrr . . . "courtesy" of The Golf Channel) and linked them to the Big Break bio page for each player. The players are organized by the "team" they were assigned to in the first episode.

Team
Purple




Samantha

Kim

Courtney

Tina

Team
Pink




Cirbie

Adrienne

Elizabeth

Sophie

Team
Orange




Lori

Dana

Christina

Susan



**** Warning: Here Be Spoilers! Arrgghhhh! **** (<--not me)

Big Break: Ka'anapali

Episode 1: "Hit the Ground Running"
Tuesday, April 15, 2008

It's early and no one was eliminated on the first show, so these are just some random, general thoughts on the first episode:
  • Okay, okay. I know I said earlier that I understand that The Big Break is not real golf. Moreover, I like cute girls in beachwear as much as the next guy . . . but what they heck was up with the digging in the sand for clues and the swimming pool "Marco Polo" ?!?!?!? Would they have made the guys from Big Break: Mesquite do anything like that? No, of course not. Sadly [sigh], I am a man and therefore a pig. So I enjoyed it when the girls started ripping off their clothing to jump into the pool. [sigh]
  • How did Cirbe, the no-shoe-wearing, self-described "rocker chick" even get on the show? And why, oh why, did she have to end up on the team that won immunity (despite her car-wreck of a golf swing)?! I was really hoping that she would be first off the show. I don't care about the "rocker" persona . . . I care that she clearly sucks at golf. Her slot on the show should have been given to someone more deserving. How could they even think of having someone like that on the same show as a multiple LET winner and players who have played on the LPGA Tour? Arrrggghh! These pretzels are making me thirsty!!!!
  • Kim Welch, former Washington State University standout has got some serious game, and nerves of steel. She is my early pick to win the whole thing. However, the head scarves have got to go
  • Elizabeth is my sentimental favorite for being the first ever First Tee student to make it to a professional tour (Duramed Futures Tour). Plus, she is just smokin' hot.
  • I like Samantha Head. I wonder if there is an opening for Mr. Head? If so, please forward me an application. I'm ready to dive in on a moment's notice.
  • Since Cirbe can't be first to go because of her team's immunity, Susan needs to go. She seems nice enough, but she doesn't have the game and she's dragging the rest of her team down.
  • Dana bugs the carp out of me. (yes, that's right, I said carp. ) The comment about being the "Cougar-Momma" on the show who is "going to teach these young girls how to play golf" made me heave a little.
  • I expected more from Sophie Sandalo. No nekkedness and suspect shotmaking. (Fore!) But she seems like she'd be fun to hang out with.
  • In the "50 yard shot" challenge, most of the girls were not impressive.
  • Who was the player who said "@#$%" when Kim nearly chipped in from the bunker, and prompted Kim's teammate Courtney (who seemed equally shocked) to jokingly say "Don't be jealous." Whoever it was (they didn't show her - she was off camera at the time), I like her. Unless it was Cirbe . . . or Dana . . . or Lori . . .
  • Andrew Magee?!? How'd that happen? Did Stephanie Sparks refuse to work with Stina Sternberg, or vice-versa? Ugggh, someone call Vince Cellini ASAP!
Ahhhh yes, another 12-14 weeks of blathering about a reality TV show to look forward to.
Good times, good times.





Tuesday, April 15, 2008

The Masters: Coverage of a Golf Major the Way It Should Be.

I'll let the big boys (and girls) at The Golf Channel, Golf Digest, Golf Magazine, and ESPN dissect the details of the Master's competition itself. But I wanted to briefly touch on the coverage aspect of the 2008 Master's, which was impressive to say the least.

On DirecTV: 3 different channels showing live coverage (main broadcast, Amen Corner, and the 14th and 15th holes), and a 4th showing split screen for the other 3 and highlights.

On the internet: live streaming video with up to 3 different feeds and interactive menus, hole descriptions, flyovers, statistics, and walk-throughs. And to top it all off, limited commercial interruptions.

Taking a cue from its incredibly successful venture into online broadcasting a few years ago with the NCAA basketball tournament, CBS streamed complete coverage of Amen Corner and holes 14 and 15 on the internet. For those with DirecTV, the bonus coverage was also available on television in both standard and high definition broadcasts. The internet feeds were stable and the coverage was outstanding. Viewers could switch back an forth between the feeds with a click of the mouse, or the press of a remote button.

Instead of just a couple of hours of coverage a day that shows only the players' (and by "players", of course I mean Tiger Woods) tee shots and putts, we got to see as many hours and as many different shots as our eyes could take. And the broadcast was even tolerable to watch live because of the limitation on commercials. It was like the difference between reading a novel versus reading the Cliff's Notes version of the novel - Cliff's Notes may be quicker, easier, and brainless, but reading and digesting the depth and detail of the novel itself is infinitely more satisfying.

On top of the video coverage itself, the Master's website was first rate. You could seemlessly switch between video feeds and call up the leaderboard and player statistics with a single click.



The leaderboard window allowed viewers to pinpoint the location of players on the course, and to view details about each hole.



For even more detail, viewers could click their way to diagrams, video flyovers, and interactive walking tours of each hole.







The coverage of the 2008 Master's reminded me why televised coverage of golf can be not simply worth watching, but compelling.

And while I realize that it's not practical to cover every golf tournament the way the Master's is covered, I do think that the 4 majors, the Ryder Cup, and the U.S. Men's and Women's Amateur deserve similar treatment. But since I know that won't happen, at least not this year, I would settle for comprehensive "Master's type" coverage for the Ryder Cup this year. Please?





Monday, April 14, 2008

Bobby Hudson/University of Texas Named GolfWeek Player/Men's Team of Week

Congratulations to Bobby Hudson and The University of Texas men's golf team for their selection as the "Player of the Week" and "Team of the Week" by Golfweek Magazine following the Longhorn's victory at the Morris Williams Intercollegiate golf tournament at the team's home course, The University of Texas Golf Club. The Longhorns went 14-0, and won the tournament by 6 strokes over second place finisher, Oklahoma State.

Hudson, a redshirt freshman, set a course record 6-under par 65 on the final day and finished with medalist honors, winning the tournament by four shots over the next closest competitor, Longhorn teammate Charlie Holland who finished in solo second place.

The University of Texas has a proud golf tradition that has produced professional standouts including Ben Crenshaw, Tom Kite, Justin Leonard, Mark Brooks, Sherri Steinhower, Betsy Rawls, Charlotta Sorenstam, and perhaps the finest golf instructor ever to live, Harvey Penick.

You can read the full stories at Golfweek.com:

http://www.golfweek.com/college/potw/story/hudson-041408

http://www.golfweek.com/college/potw/story/texas-041408


Hook 'Em Horns!





Sunday, April 13, 2008

The Double Bogey Golfer

In golf, the beginning of the physical side of the the golf swing is the swing trigger. But in a broader sense, anyone diving into the deep end of the pool that is the game of golf must eventually pay the green fee and head for the first tee. Sure, you can dip your toe into the pool and test the temperature of the water. You can borrow clubs and go to the range. You can take a few lessons. You can practice, practice, practice . . .

But sooner or later, if you want to pursue this grand old game, you must dive into the pool head first. And with rare exception [cough] Tiger Woods [cough], the water will be cold . . . very cold. Sooner or later, you will trek out to your local 18-hole course, scorecard in hand, and record your strokes. All of them. And there will be a lot of strokes to record. The numbers will be high.

Fortunately, the USGA has implemented measures to save your sanity (and the sanity of the foursome behind you). As part of the handicapping process, the USGA dictates that every new golfer, who has not yet established an official USGA handicap through the playing and recording of a minimum number of rounds, is assumed to have the maximum allowable handicap of 36.4 (essentially, double bogey on each of the 18 holes) for purposes of the Equitable Stroke Control calculation. That means that each and every one of us starts our golfing life as a "Double Bogey Golfer". (Well, sort of. Ladies start with a maximum allowable handicap of 40.4. But that messes up my clever little nickname for beginning golfers, so we're just going to disregard that anomaly for now. Mmmkay?)

Ignoring a few half-hearted and ill-fated attempts during my college years, I started my life as a Double Bogey Golfer slightly over a year-and-a-half ago. It all started as a desperate attempt to find a summer "hobby" to distract me from the intense pain caused by the lack of snow in the mountains. You see, "no snow=no snowboarding". (Hello, my name is Eric, and I am a snowboardaholic.) Oh sure, there were the occasional trips to Mt. Hood in the summer to alleviate the withdrawal.

But, truthfully, for a full-blown snow addict like me, that was like putting a band-aid on a bullet wound. It was a temporary measure at best. I filled my summers with snowboard websites, gear catalogs, and endless clicks on weather.com for an updated projection for the first snow. But I needed something new. Something for the summer. Something that could keep my mind away from thoughts of frozen, crystalline, water drops until . . . well, until the snow gods saw fit to funnel the cold weather and precipitation into the convergence zone of the Cascade mountains. And it was finally a company golf day that provided just the opportunity I had been waiting for.

With about a week's notice, I spent several hours in the hitting cages of a few local stores demoing the least expensive "box sets" I could find. Somehow, miraculously, I ended up with a serviceable set despite my complete inability to swing them with any precision whatsoever. And off I went to play golf at a local municipal course with several of my colleagues.

Little did I know it at the time, but my foray into golf as a distraction would soon turn into a full blown obsession all of its own. A beautiful, challenging, frustrating, exhilarating obsession. I love the smell of the grass on the first tee . . . I love the range time . . . I love the gear . . . I love The Golf Channel . . . I love the lessons . . . I love the demo days (oh, the demo days!)

Hello, my name is Eric, and I'm a golfaholic.